Thursday, January 29, 2009

Mail Theft by Seamus Hatch et al


Seamus Hatch (pictured) fradulently forwarded mail belonging to Jon Goodwin to a residence he shared with Marcia Hatch (a/k/a Marcia Bruggeman, Marsha Hatch and Marsh Bruggeman of Heller Ehrman– she’s currently a “partner” with Gunderson Detmer), at 200 Townsend Street, Unit 5 in San Francisco. See Exhibit: [20061211ZZZZXXXREDS]

Goodwin discovered this incident of Hatch's theft of his mail on December 11, 2006. But Marcia Hatch's criminal defense lawyer, Miles Ehrlich, a former federal prosecutor who Goodwin complained to about Marcia Hatch, Seamus Hatch, Heller Ehrman, Michael Bock, et al while Ehrlich was the head of the white colloar crime division of the Northern California "declined" to investigate Goodwin's complaint opting instead to resign his post at the US Attorney's office (late 2005) and go to work helping Marcia Hatch, her husband and their confederates to evade justice.

Being a federal prosecutor is kinda like being President. They can pardon criminals-- apparently as long as the criminals agree to retain them after they leave "office."

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Dear: Citibank and Bank of America

We understand Heller is trying to slither you out of your secured position in the loan you made to them. There are rumblings "Heller May Sue Over Banks' over 'Error.'" We think this is probably empty saber rattling but perhaps EvilEsq can help steer you to information to help you pierce Heller's veils and siphon the money they owe you directly from the "shareholders" pockets. See: http://www.evilesq.com/about to determine how to make contact.

Heller Shareholders Seek to Pay Malpractice Insurance

Attorneys for Heller Ehrman are seeking $3.48 million from the US bankruptcy court to pay legal malpractice insurance premiums, see Law.com [Article]. If their motion is granted, none of that money would trickle down to the folks who need it most... Heller's banks, landlords, vendors and non-shareholder employees.

Our suggestion, rather than jerk those funds out of creditors pockets, how about Heller's shareholders dig into theirs? If they need loans, they can appeal to the firm's ex-money-laundering czar, shareholder Marcia-Marsha Hatch. Certainly her narcotics trafficking friend from Berkeley, "Scottie" would be delighted to assist the "kind folks" that protected him, Marcia and the rest of her gang.

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

American Bar Association Recalls 230,000 Defective Lawyers

Thursday, January 1, 2009

Sandeep Baweja, Esquire *** [________] ***

Thirty-eight year old, Irvine attorney Sandeep Baweja, Esquire, and stock “guru” pro-tem has admitted to pissing away over $2.7 million, that was supposed to be held in his “trust” account and paid out to plaintiffs he represented in a class action suit against ZipRealty. »» read more

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Marcia Hatch Posts

Looking to launder money? Have sex in a public place? Steal assets from your partners? Bribe foreign officials? Cause the bankruptcy of a major law firm? Screw your victim(s) and their children real good?

Psychopath Gunderson Dettmer attorney Marcia Hatch a/k/a Marcia Bruggeman, Marsha Hatch, Marsha Bruggeman is the counsel for you. Click any of the following links to learn more about Marcia-Marsha's qualifications:

Monday, December 29, 2008

Steven J. Lever

On this date in the Empire State, Steven J. Lever, Esquire, an intellectual property attorney, formerly with Kirkland & Ellis in New York City, was suspended by the New York bar after attempting to arrange a meeting "to engage in an oral sexual act" with a female he believed to be 13 years old-- via an Internet chat room-- in 2004. » » read more

Saturday, December 13, 2008

Sidebar: Advice to Heller Ehrmans Landlords Counsel

Agent 41 here with advice to Heller Ehrman's landlords' counsel.  Plead R.I.C.O., pierce the veil of their maze of LLP's and siphon the money the "shareholders" owe you out of their personal assets.  Isn't R.I.C.O. still treble damages?  Let us know if you need any help!  As soon as the Feds arrest Marcia Bruggeman Hatch and her cronies, we'd be delighted.  Until then...  Happy Siphoning!

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Whats on Scott Drexels Mind? Christmas Money?

During a meeting of the State “Bar” of California JoAnne Earls Robbins (a former “State Bar Court Judge”), who now "defends" EvilEsq’s, criticized the disciplinary system as “unreasonably strict” and advocated against permanent disbarment.

Is this broad a bartender? She can't be an attorney / former judge. Or if she's not an impostor, she of all people should know, that in California, Federal Prosecutors like Miles Frederick Erhlich, can take a crime witness/victim’s information and parlay that into a big dollar gig advising the criminal suspects how to evade prosecution by bullying the witness/victim and the State “Bar” of California won’t help the victim or even investigate his complaint?

Or a shareholder in a major law firm, the now deceased Heller Ehrman, (Marcia Bruggeman Hatch a/k/a Marsha Hatch, Marsha Bruggeman) can promote a well developed scheme to launder money of a narcotics trafficker, knowingly participate in defrauding a partner of a merchant banking firm to which she had fiduciary duties, assist to convert the assets of the merchant banking firm (i.e., steal them), participate in the theft of electronic information and U.S. Mail, have anal sex in the “executive conference facilities at the Ritz,” with another partner of the merchant banking firm, and on and on and on-- and the California Bar refuses to assist the witness/victim to bring the matter to the attention of the authorities?

The State Bar of California’s disciplinary system is unreasonably strict?

Lawyers and judges are officers of the court! The public must be able to trust them.

She’s obviously lost compassion for her subject matter, the law and the preservation of public trust in the judicial system. Somebody needs to sentence her to work for a victim’s advocacy group (after they PERMANENTLY DISBAR her for an IQ violation).

I think I’ll write her a letter.

Dear Stupid or Corrupt (whichever you are),

Because the clowns at the State Bar of California are corrupt? Or are morons who can’t read? I won’t be spending Christmas with my son this year. In fact, I haven’t for several years because two of California’s finest licensed criminals, Miles Frederick Ehrlich and Marcia Bruggman Hatch have sent me into a self imposed exile, fearing for my life because I turned Marica Bruggeman Hatch into the DOJ (Miles Ehrlich was the first AUSA I spoke to before he became Marcia’s criminal defense lawyer). Marcia is close friends with the head of a San Francisco narcotics trafficking ring. They became “buddies” living in the dorms at the University of California, Berkeley. I really don’t want to die at the hands of his thugs— former Cal athletes and assorted other characters.

Without a father to guide him, my son turned to using drugs and dropped out of school. He’s become a victim of the “strict” California Bar too.

I lost all of my assets. Stolen. Gone. Poof! There've been weeks when I’ve had to go without food. I’ve lost friends and business contacts as a consequence of Miles Ehrlich’s selling me out to Marcia Hatch, Heller Ehrman et al. Obviously I can't get a real job.

So your idea is to slap the hands of attorneys who can’t afford to bribe prosecutors or the State Bar of California, Office of the Chief “Disciplinary” Counsel? Sounds like a winning idea to me. I suppose you’d also be in favor of banning guns so that citizens of the great State of California can’t form militias to rid that beautiful state of all your corrupt lawyer cronies and start fresh?

Merry Christmas to you too!

***
Apparently, the only way anyone can survive in California is to become a lawyer. So if you’re a crime victim or witness to criminal activity involving lawyers in California my advice is.... RUN!
***
According to the article, the State Bar is holding another “hearing” in San Francisco tomorrow. Well... tis the season! Perhaps these hearings are scheduled in early December so Scott Drexel can make the rounds of the law firms and pick up his “Christmas Bonuses.” If anyone sees him carting around a trolley laden with black briefcases, please snap a photo and forward it to us.

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Change? Or More Bullshit?

Dear President Elect Obama,

Congratulations on your election.  Unfortunately I couldn't vote in this election.  No I'm not a convicted felon. I'm a crime victim and witness who has to remain hidden out of fear for my life, separated from my family, friends and a son who has desperately needed the involvement of his father in his life. 

Let me give you a snippet of my story.  I was a partner in a merchant banking firm-- Barra Partners.  One of my partners, Seamus Hatch, a U.K. citizen with a U.S. green card met, dated and eventually married a partner with a major law firm (Heller Ehrman-- a lot of Heller Ehrman attorneys donated to your campaign as well, I'm sure, to the DNC), Marcia Bruggeman Hatch.  Ms. Bruggeman Hatch has a close friend from college who purports to be the head of a major narcotics trafficking ring that operate(s)(ed) in the San Francisco Bay Area.  Ms. Bruggeman-Hatch and her husband promoted the idea of laundering her friend’s drug money using Barra Partners.  They went so far as to introduce me to this individual-- I had no idea who he was or how he "earns a living" until they informed me during and after the meeting.   I refused to go along with their scheme.  Rather, I initiated a private investigation into her husband’s activities.  During the course of my investigation I discovered fraud upon my firm perpetrated by Seamus Hatch, bribing judicial officials, electronic data theft and infractions of the foreign corrupt practices act.

Information in hand, on May 9, 2005, I reported the foregoing activity to Miles Frederick Ehrlich, the then head of the White Collar Crime division of the US Attorney's San Francisco office (Mr. Ehrlich donated to your presidential campaign-- I did not).  During the course of my conversation with Mr. Ehrlich, I identified Ms. Bruggeman Hatch, Heller Ehrman as well as other individuals involved to varying degrees.  Mr. Ehrlich told me he would speak to investigators and get back to me.  He never did.  Rather, Mr. Ehrlich quit his job with as an AUSA, established a criminal defense law practice in Berkeley, California and began representing Ms. Bruggeman-Hatch and her husband against to assist them to evade investigation/prosecution as well as deter me from continuing to pursue remedies against his client(s).

Upon learning of Mr. Ehrlich's representation of Ms. Bruggeman-Hatch, I re-reported the case to a US Attorney and have spoken to investigators at the FBI.  So far the DOJ has done nothing to protect me.  I guess they’re trying to whisk this under the rug too?

Because the case involves money laundering and narcotics trafficking, as a witness and victim I've been separated from my child and family.  My father died earlier this year, but out of fear for my life I couldn't attend his funeral.  My child has gotten himself involved in drugs and dropped out of school but out of fear for my life as well as the safety of my family, I couldn't be there to lead him in the right direction.

We need to restructure the judicial branch of the U.S. Government and we need to regulate attorneys.  Bar Associations are too sparsely funded to adequately regulate attorney conduct.  And allowing them to continue to regulate themselves is not an option.  Apparently, I'm a victim without remedies but I would like my child to have a country free of a corrupt government, influenced by special interests-- including ATTORNEYS.

That would be change!

Sunday, October 5, 2008

Sidebar: Trysting at the Ritz

EvilEsq followers have been inquiring regarding Marcia Bruggeman Hatch’s “maneuverings” in the “executive conference facilities at the Ritz” during her “courtship” with husband Seamus John Paul Hatch.  We caught up with Jon Goodwin outside EvilEsq studios after the taping of a forthcoming video series, regarding Heller Ehrman, the Hatch’s and their cohorts in crime and asked about their trysting at Ritz.  Here’s what he had to say.

“The week prior to Hatch’s 'date' with Marcia Bruggeman, Hatch and I had been in Las Vegas meeting with a client.  We drove together in my vehicle.  I wanted to stay in Vegas for the weekend but Hatch was anxious to return to see Bruggeman, who I believe was travelling back to San Francisco from a personal trip to London where she’d met some of Hatch’s friends-- Trevor Wooding and Robert Hughes as I recall.  In the throes of a divorce from his first wife, Emily Church, Hatch had been depressed for months.  In deference to his romantic interests, I agreed to leave Vegas rather than stay the weekend.  Upon our return to San Francisco, I dropped Hatch off and wished him luck.

Monday morning Hatch came into the office and sat at his desk.  He was visibly excited, the tenor of his voice gleeful.  I asked how his date with Bruggeman, had gone (up to that point I’d only met her once so I think I referred to her as ‘the attorney’).  Hatch quickly rose from his chair, turned, looked at me and said ‘I buggered her in the executive conference facilities at the Ritz.’  He was beaming.  I’d never seen him so excited.  It was if he’d just won first place in the greased pig contest at the Lenawee County Fair in Adrian, Michigan.  ‘You buggered an attorney’ I said, incredulous at his response.  Erroneously believing I was challenging him, he responded ‘we took photos.’ 

Though Hatch is a very convincing liar, I’m certain he was telling the truth on this occasion.  And it wasn’t out of character for him to share details of his intimate liaisons.  In the year or so I’d known him, he’d spontaneously shared too many details of his relationship with his estranged wife.  Months later, as I sifted through my firm’s electronic mail, I came across an email between Hatch and Bruggeman that supports his account of their encounter." 

Goodwin also appealed for the return of his mail that Marcia and Seamus Hatch redirected to their prior residence at 200 Townsend Street, Unit 5 in San Francisco, of course without his authorization.  “Just send it to Kevin Goodwin at Sonosite.”

Monday, September 29, 2008

Hellers Vermin Vote to Flee-- Conflicts We Surmise

Heller Ehrman have not publically described the source or nature of the “conflicts” cited by various media sources that caused the termination of merger discussions with both Baker McKenzie and Mayer Brown.  They’ve left this open for speculation.  According to a post on the ATL blog, presumably by a Heller shareholder in the know… “the IP Lit group was the source of the conflicts that broke up the Baker marriage” (see Above the Law, "Breaking Shareholder Meeting," paragraph 9).

Here’s our take. Heller Ehrman’s IP Litigation Group represent Sonosite (NASDAQ: SONO) regarding patent litigation initiated by GE (NYSE: GE). Remaining at issue is SONO’s seminal U.S. patent 5,722,412 for a digital ultrasound weighing less than 10 pounds that GE is seeking to invalidate.  This patent essentially gives Sonosite a monopoly on the portable ultrasound market. The case (No. 08-C-298), is scheduled for trial in June 2009. According to Yahoo! Finance, SONO’s market capitalization has hovered around $550 million over the past month. Worldwide, GE is the market leader in the medical ultrasound field. According to media reports, GE has a line of compact ultrasound systems, weighing less than 10 lbs, ready for market pending the outcome of this suit. If SONO were to lose the suit, GE would immediately attack its monopoly position in the sub-ten pound market which would have a significant impact on the firm’s value.

Patricia Thayer, a Heller Ehrman Shareholder based in San Francisco states in her biography that she’s the firm’s co-chair of the Intellectual Property Litigation practice group.  According to various news sources, Ms. Thayer is the lead attorney representing Sonosite regarding litigation initiated by General Electric in mid-2007.  Other members of the Heller Ehrman,  Sonosite litigation team include, Mark S. Parris (Shareholder, Seattle, WA), John S. Skilton (Shareholder, Washington D.C., and Madison, WI), Sarah C. Walkenhorst (Associate, Madison, WI), Owais Siddiqui (Associate, San Diego CA).  Venue for the litigation is the Wisconsin Western District Court in Madison.  Another attorney, David E. Jones of Heller Ehrman’s Madison office, states in his professional biography that he represented GE versus Gamesa.  Mr. Jones is a member of Heller’s Intellectual Property Litigation practice group.  David Goodwin, who left Heller for Covington & Burling in early July, 2008, counted General Electric as one of his significant clients. Goodwin, a Heller shareholder practicing in the Insurance Recovery Group had been at the firm since 1986. Suzanne Hawkins joined Heller Ehrman in September 2007 as Chief of ‘Practice Excellence.’  Prior to joining Heller, Ms. Hawkins was General Electric’s Senior Counsel, Legal Operations.  Michael Thorp, a shareholder in Heller’s Seattle office has also represented GE.

To our knowledge, none of the aforementioned Patent Litigation attorneys representing SONO have shifted to Covington or other firms. 

The duty of loyalty owed to a client prohibits a lawyer from representing another party with interests adverse to a client or about whom the lawyer had acquired confidential information. Relevant imputed disqualification rules require that a law firm not represent a client when any attorney employed by the firm would be prohibited from such representation practicing alone (see Wisconsin Rules of Professional Conduct).

GE's interests are certainly adverse to the interests of SONO. At least four current and former Heller attorneys have represented GE in significant matters, including Intellectual property disputes (see Gamesa v GE), and have certainly acquired “confidential information” during the course of those representations or in the case of Ms. Hawkins, her employment.

Our interpretation of relevant Rules of Professional Conduct is that the “conflict” Heller assumed by representing SONO could only have been waived by GE. And there’s no evidence that GE either waived or was notified of this conflict by Heller.

In addition to the foregoing, Jon Goodwin, first cousin of Kevin Goodwin, (no known relation to David Goodwin formerly of Heller) sued Heller Ehrman and has also reported activities of Marcia Bruggeman Hatch, a Heller shareholder to the Department of Justice. These facts were known to Heller prior to their undertaking representation of SONO (see Heller Ehrman Complaint and California Bar Complaint Against Miles Ehrlich). Ms. Bruggeman Hatch’s husband Seamus Hatch, who absconded with the assets of Barra Partners, was informed of Jon Goodwin’s familial relationship with Kevin Goodwin, SONO’s CEO.

Heller is being paid in excess of $12 million to represent SONO. Reason enough, we believe, for a firm desperate for revenue to overlook its conflicts. So what happens if SONO loses the litigation with GE? Undoubtedly, SONO’s market capitalization will suffer significantly because its monopoly position in the sub-ten pound market segment will have been breached by a goliath competitor. SONO’s shareholders will certainly commence a derivative action against SONO and Heller.

Has GE waived Heller’s conflict? What would happen if GE loses the suit? If they haven’t waived the conflict, GE would certainly commence an action against Heller.

By undertaking representation of SONO, Heller's management placed the firm in the unenviable position of potentially being sued whether they win or lose the SONO-GE litigation. Potential damages from either suit would certainly far exceed Heller’s professional liability coverage. This would explain Baker’s and Mayer’s reluctance to merge with the firm. Why would they burden their partnerships with such a contingent liability? We believe it also explains Heller’s management’s decision to liquidate the firm rather than downsizing and trying to go it alone. By liquidating now, they can possibly insulate the partnership and the partners from the vise of  potentially catastrophic lawsuits which could pierce the firm's veil of limited liability. Flee or fight. We believe that was the decision tabled to Heller's shareholders last week. Heller’s Vermin voted to flee.

More Marriages-- Who the F#&k Pays the Court Costs?

Gay marriage is a hot topic this political season. Here at EvilEsq, we don't have a problem with it conceptually. Of course, we'd expect that gays who marry would be monogamous, not fraternize with the opposite sex and issue children-- so as not to further polute the gene pool. But that's our opinion.

What's got our goat is the prospect of increased taxes to subsidize the cost of increased use of the courts for divorces. In fact, we think it would be a good idea to increase court fees for all divorces in-line with the actual cost of the courts adjudicating marital bifurcation. And while we’re at it, let's cap legal fees for divorces. How about $1,000 for each party without children? Add $500 per kid, $25 per dog and $1 per cat (who wants a cat?). We think such measures would improve the palatability of gay marriage to the general public and disabuse us cynics of our notion that the issue is being promoted by lawyers in order to expand the addressable market for divorces and hence their bank accounts.

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Hellers Fall, Barstool Analysis by Emanuel Heller

EvilEsq caught up with Emanuel Heller after the “shareholder” video conference Wednesday.

“Incredulous.  That’s the only word that aptly describes how I feel after bearing witness to the picture show performance of Mr. Larabee. Heller Ehrman bankrupt?  Stunning news” he said, knocking back three fingers of red-eye whisky at Sam’s Grill & Seafood Restaurant across from Heller's headquarters at 333 Bush Street in San Francisco’s financial district.

“As far as meetings go, it was a congress of buffoons.  Nobody took responsibility for anything, just pointed fingers, whined and kvetched.

Some woman—since when did they allow women to become lawyers?  I’ve never known a woman who could keep a secret. What’ll they do next, allow them to vote? …I digress.

Some woman at the meeting said she thought that Larabee chap was conducting the conference from a cave somewhere. The picture quality was much better than we ever had back in the 1920’s.  But throughout the get-together I could hear the warbling of giant bats and the electricity cut out a couple of times. She said those were heli-co-peters.  Whatever those are? She said she thought he’s in Pakistan. Huh? Is he avoiding a lynch mob?

I still can’t understand what in tar-nation they did to yentz the firm up but I have some thoughts.

Heller, Powers & Ehrman was a corporate law firm. We did some probate work but our focus was on serving corporations. 

We weren’t litigators. You see, litigators aren’t problem solvers, they’re trouble makers. It’s their job to make enemies, destroy opponents. They’re the Pit Bulls of the lawyer world. The more adversarial they are, the more fees they collect.

On the other hand, corporate lawyers must be problem solvers. In addition to advising clients regarding the law, it’s their job to further trust among parties. They’re the Golden Retrievers of the lawyer world—everybody’s friend and trusted confidant. That’s how they make their living.

Heller evolved from a corporate law firm to a litigation firm then crossed those cultures. The litigators nestled with the corporate lawyers referring matters to and fro. This mingling distracted practitioners to the point of losing compassion for their respective subject matters, opting instead to sample the fruits of their colleagues.

The firm wound up with a bunch of mixed breeds in the rank and file.  Who’d trust such a mixed breed I ask?  One minute he’s bringing you a ball and the next he’s got your child’s head in his mouth, shaking it violently.
 
Over time, the pugnacious, Pit Bull genes began to dominate the culture of the firm. The firm’s litigation prowess grew. Money and champagne flowed amplifying the enormous egos of the pack leaders and inspiring the minions to mimic their deeds.

Client interests were replaced with promotion of the pack and aggrandizement of the leaders. The power of the pack grew, emboldening them beyond the limits of the law, ethics and morals. Their unchallenged authority intoxicated the leaders’ intelligence causing them to lead the pack in directions that did not comport with the reality of clients’ interests or the monetary resources of the firm. eCompare, Barra PartnersAran Strategic Finance - Marcia Bruggeman Hatch – Seamus Hatch – Miles Ehrlich, Qualcomm, Sonosite, gyms, cafeterias, concierges, oversized posh offices, etc. all caught up with them. 

Sonosite was the proverbial banana peel. The firm's conflict with GE sunk em'. No merger partner would take on that liability.  Can't blame em'.

Barkeep. Another round for me and my colleagues.”

We'll have more with Mr. Heller as soon as we sober up.

Monday, September 22, 2008

Emanuel Heller Joins EvilEsq as S.F. Bureau Chief, Posthumous

EvilEsq is honored to announce that Emanuel S. Heller, Esquire has joined our staff as San Francisco Bureau Chief, Posthumous. Mr. Heller founded Heller Ehrman at 124 Sansome Street, Room 30, in San Francisco, California in 1890. Heller Attended the University of California Berkeley, matriculating with a Bachelor of Sciences degree in 1885. He attended Hastings College of Law, was conferred an LL.B. in 1889 and was thereafter admitted to the California Bar (1889). Heller and his partners Frank H. Powers and Sidney M. Ehrman specialized in Corporation and Banking law representing clients such as Wells Fargo & Nevada National Bank, Union Trust Company, Columbus Savings & Loan Society, Lumbermens Trust Company, The National Surety Company and Pabst Brewing Company from their offices in the Royal Insurance Building at 201 Sansome Street (at Pine).

Heller makes his home in Styx River, “next door to a plot where Johnnie Cochran is building his eternal abode.” He’ll commute daily to EvilEsq’s new San Francisco bureau at 333 Bush Street “as soon as the current occupants are evicted and the conference rooms sanitized."

Mr. Heller can be reached at manny.heller@gmail.com (He’s learning to type so be patient.)

Sunday, September 21, 2008

Liquidation Vote at Heller— Founder Furious

Bad news first. The Advertisement “Heller placed in EvilEsq” didn’t seem to work. Sorry guys. We’ll do better next time! Butt [sic] maybe Baker or Mayer or a dark horse... Brobeck? hmm maybe not... will make an 11th hour and 59th minute bid— hope dies last.

Okay news second. EvilEsq’s top ranked group of EvilEsqs  are voting this week whether to continue their scourge together or wind up operations and fan out across the land to soil the reputations of other unsuspecting law firms. According to various other reputable news sources, fifty (that's five-zero) have already left to Covington, Orrick, Jones Day, Proskauer Rose and a couple others. Rumor has it Heller’s Managing Shareholder, Robert Hubble already has three offers—WOW!  And a little birdie informed us, Marcia Bruggeman Hatch is considering taking a newly created “Of Counsel” position at San Francisco’s Power Exchange, one of her husband’s favorite haunts when he's swinging. Imagine the benefits! DOUBLE WOW. Butt [sic] what a loss for VLG who was “trying to keep the [gang] together.” And Heller's Madison Wisconsin "Rocket Docket" IP lawyers are holding a beauty contest next week to determine who's ship they're going to jump to. TRIPLE WOW. Err, hmm. Who's going to manage the Sonosite Litigation on the "Rocket Docket?"

No word yet on where Barry Levin, Matt Larabee and David Jargiello are headed. Although, “Sweet Tits” informed, “Forty-One,” our roving reporter, on the ATL Blog— that she’s filling out her “lateral form”— butt [sic] is hemming and hawing about how much to insert in the client billings field— she asked elliptically if our reporter would spot her $5 million of billings for the next year— we think she’s VLG because $5 million is delusional thinking... unless of course she's in the money-laundering group.  Agent Forty-One offered her this proposition— quid pro quo— bay-bee.  We’ll stay abreast of that and let you know as soon as we hear what Sweet Tits decided.

Incredible news last. Emanuel Heller awoke from his dirt nap and is planning on attending the “Shareholder” vote meeting on Tuesday to figure out how “that bunch of clowns managed to fuck up my [sic] 119 year old law firm to the point they’re contemplating shit canning it.” No word as to whether Francis Powers, Mr. Heller’s partner, will also be attending. Butt [sic] we’re hearing rumblings that a group of current and former "clients" who Heller either “rodgered” or is in the process of “rodgering” may stage a "roast" outside the firm’s San Francisco headquarters.

We here at EvilEsq are energized about spinning all these events. Depending on where Heller’s Vermin land, we believe their scattering of scat will vastly increase the amount of fodder for our cannons— be they loose.

Stay tuned, the forthcoming week promises to be heavy news wise.

ATL Post from Agent 41 to Sweet Tits-- We Think Shes VLG

The following is an Above the Law Post Submitted to EvilEsq by "Forty-One" a disciple and contributor, who claims authorship, in response to a series of vitriolic posts directed at him by an individual who alleges she's a Heller Ehrman shareholder.

"Tell you what Sweet Tits, if you can recover the $25+million (more like $32 [million]) your friend/law partner/colleague, Marcia Hatch and her husband stole from me and my firm, I’d be delighted to lend a hand with your lateral. While you’re at it how bout you help the other victims of their crimes… like Glenn Watson:


Like me, Glenn has a family who depend [sic] on him. It’s very sad that a couple psychopaths stole and misused his identity jeopardizing his ability to support his family, just as they did me.

If you’d like I can send you a list of the other victims—there are five other individuals that I’m certain of and more I suspect have been victims of your friend/law partner/colleague. Perhaps you can help them too.

While you’re at it, perhaps you could recover my personal mail that Seamus and Marcia Hatch redirected, without authorization or my knowledge to their residence. Just send it to Kevin Goodwin of Sonosite.

Regarding the money-laundering, narcotics trafficking and bribing judicial officials, you’re welcome to review my witness affidavits and even speak to the witnesses— you might want to check with the Feds first to be certain they don’t get the impression you’re trying to tamper with witnesses— one of whom might I add is a senior partner of a major law firm. And yes, in Marcia Hatch’s plot regarding money laundering there are witnesses. If you want to read a bit more about this see:


and


Two questions I’d really like an answer to—when Marcia and Seamus Hatch were in my S.F. flat in early July, 2003— without my knowledge or consent—a witness informed me of this-- did they wash the sheets when they were "done?" And 2) have they destroyed the data files they copied off my computer?

If I don’t hear from you… good luck with your lateral!

41"

Friday, September 19, 2008

John Edward Grasberger

On this date in the Golden State the illustrious State Bar of California suspended (interim) John Edward Grasberger, age 61, of La Mesa, California after he was convicted of possession of child pornography. » » read more

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Heller Ehrmans Venerable Money Laundering Practice Up for Grabs

Short on legal tender, hemorrhaging rainmaking attorneys and unable to find a merger partner, EvilEsq has learned San Francisco based Heller Ehrman has put the firm’s lucrative money-laundering practice up for bid. Chaired by Marcia Bruggeman-Hatch, the money laundering practice figured prominently, albeit quietly, in the firm’s capabilities.

“It was our primary source of cash for bonuses, political donations, charitable contributions, bribes and paying vendors who don’t accept checks—if you know what I mean,” said the alter ego of a Heller attorney who spoke to us on condition of anonymity. “It’s just too bad we couldn’t use the cash to make payroll or pay-down our credit line otherwise the firm wouldn’t be in the [financial] predicament we’re in. It’s very sad, particularly for all the international charities that benefited from facilitating the movement of cash from ‘Scottie’ [Ms. Hatch’s narcotics trafficking client], to his overseas suppliers. I’m sure whoever acquires the practice will want to designate their own judges, politicians and charities.”

Interested bidders are unknown to us at press time. EvilEsq intends to continue covering this story as it develops. Any information provided by third parties will of course be treated in confidence.

Monday, September 15, 2008

Mark F. Cohn

On this date in the Golden State the illustrious State Bar of California suspended (interim) Mark Cohn, age 54, of Redwood City, California after he was convicted of wire fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering, » » read more

Jagroop Singh Gill

On this date in the Golden State the illustrious State Bar of California suspended (interim) Jagroop Singh Gill, age 51, of Chowchilla, California after he was convicted of felony drunk driving. » » read more

Friday, September 12, 2008

Cyber Attack Tases Scribds Scribes

Followers of EvilEsq are aware our documents were summarily banished from scribd.com on September 5, 2008. So far, the folks at scribd have refused to provide us a cogent explanation as to why. In fact, they refuse to formally respond altogether-- no doubt on advice of counsel, whoever that may be. Of course that’s never stopped EvilEsq from unearthing the facts. While we don’t discuss our methods, based on anonymous eye-witness accounts EvilEsq has been able to piece together some of the events of Friday, September 5, 2008.

At approximately 14:40 Tijuana time, scribd.com was hit with a massive DNS or DDos attack-- accounts vary as to which. The attack knocked out the scribd.com service for approximately forty-five minutes. According to a witness, who asked to be identified only as ‘Packets’ out of fear his Facebook page might be vandalized, “it was the most powerful attack we’ve ever experienced. More powerful than the attack that followed that dolt’s posting of the nude photo of Dick Cheney on our system. Or the time somebody uploaded the engineering computations and renderings of Pamela Anderson’s boob job. It brought our cluster [a group of servers] to its knees. Choked our super-turbo-midi-smoke shifting router with hundreds of thousands of simultaneous page requests. Shortly after the attack began, I got a call from headquarters in San Francisco. They couldn’t access the site and were going nuts.”

“I called ‘Softie’ [SoftLayer Technologies]. They’re our data services provider. The dude over there said he had no idea what was going-on but would call their network infrastructure providers to see if they had a clue. Well about ten minutes later I got a call back. The Softie guy said he’d called two of their network partners. The first told him their network showed no signs of abnormal traffic. The other, Savvis, told him he’d just returned from a cigarette break and didn’t know if anything was wrong but would look into it and call him back. The Sofite dude said he agreed it was the strongest attacked he’d ever witnessed. Said there was no way they could have fully mitigated it on their end. It was surreal-- bro. Had to be institutional—the NSA or another of the Bush Administration’s lackeys. Not even the best Russian hacks could have mounted such a vigorous assault,” Packets exalted.

“I tried to call headquarters back but their phones were busy. I tried my boss’ mobile phone. No answer. I thought World War Three had broken out, said the twenty-something, seven-foot-two inch man with a body resembling an Erector set. It was epic,” he boomed, his bloodshot eyes bulging as he articulated his neck to within three inches this reporter’s nose. “When the attack ended, I bailed. That’s all I know. Nobody at HQ will talk to me about it.”

While EvilEsq has not been able to independently confirm Packet’s recitation of events, we have gathered reports from another witness on the scene at Scribd’s San Francisco headquarters. “At about the same time as the attack occurred on our system last Friday, a gaggle of more than twenty men and women, each pulling a trolley loaded with large black briefcases, showed up at our offices,” a slender elderly woman recounted. “They were dressed impeccably. All of the men wore the same lavender ties and the women lavender blouses. Their nails were nicely manicured, hair perfectly coiffed-- as if they’d just visited the salon. The combination of their perfume was asphyxiating. They smelled like a roving brothel.”

The leader, a tall lanky man of about forty with white hair, pewter skin and a doubling chin haughtily introduced himself as Mister Hatch and demanded to see our CEO—Trip Adler. Hatch’s accent was defiantly English. London I’d guess. Our receptionist, asked if they had an appointment. He sneered at her and said that he didn’t need an appointment-- only he used a curse word. The receptionist, picked up the phone and dialed Trip’s extension. Her hands were shaking so much she had to dial his extension three times, the poor dear. That Hatch man was extremely rude! Trip came right out. Hatch immediately lashed into him, telling him there were documents on the scribd.com system he wanted removed and that if he didn’t they were going to sue. These are my lawyers he said, swinging his right arm in a broad arc as if he was introducing the cast of a play.

Trip was very professional. He asked Hatch to calm down and suggested they move to the conference room. For a young man he’s remarkably poised. The lawyers packed into our conference room, it’s rather small but they seemed not to mind. They were in there for about ten minutes, with the door open. The whole office could hear. Hatch dominated the conversation waxing on about the fact that his wife was a Heller Ehrman Partner, that he was a banker, his ex-wife’s family owns a home next door to the Bush’s compound in Florida, blah blah blah. It was obvious he had no substantive reason to remove the material in question from our site. They were just trying to intimidate us—‘bullshit and bravado,’ my husband would say, God rest his sole.”

“Trip wasn’t impressed. He reached into his pocket for his autographed copy of the First Amendment— he always carries that with him. Suddenly, one of the female lawyers, a tall willowy woman with blonde hair cropped just below her ears— shot him with one of those Taser guns the cops use. Trip fell to the ground, and was paralyzed until she released the trigger on the Taser. Then the tall willowy bitch asked if he’d changed his mind. Trip said ‘no’ and she zapped him again. Jason, our ‘community guy’ here at scribd— he’s friends with Barack Obama on our system-- rushed over and pulled the wires from the Taser gun off Trip.”

“After a couple minutes, Trip stood up and addressed Hatch, informing him that if he wanted the documents removed from our servers, they’d have to file a complaint—‘pursuant to the terms on our website like everybody else.’ Then he told them to leave.”

“Hatch and one of the lawyers, a heavyset man with abnormally short legs, a sparse comb-over and the face of a homunculus, stormed out of our offices and down the stairs of our building. From where I sit on the second floor, I could see them down on the street talking on their cell phones. At about the same time, Trip received a call from one of our investors, Redpoint Ventures I think. He took the call in the reception area so I overheard his side of the conversation. He didn’t seem to know the caller so I don’t think it was the partner who usually deals with us. After a few minutes he started saying “yes sir” and “no sir” then hung up the phone without saying goodbye. Trip was fuming. His face was beat red. I’ve never seen him so angry. He walked back in his office and slammed the door—that’s when I left to go to my knitting club meeting. When I came in on Monday, nobody seemed to know what was going on. We checked our site. The documents had been removed. That’s all I know.”

EvilEsq has learned that the attack on Scribd’s servers was not an isolated event. At least three other similar attacks have occurred over the past couple years to servers hosting content linking Seamus Hatch, Marcia Hatch and Heller Ehrman to nefarious activities. The attacks were so strong that none of the webhosts, GoDaddy.com, Dreamhost.com and Hosting Panama could mitigate the damage. According to sources at Dreamhost and Hosting Panama the attacks wrought significant damage causing many of their hosting client’s sites to be offline for extended periods—days in many cases. Some clients even moved their sites to other hosting providers as a consequence of the attacks.

One tipster related that his firm hired a “cyber dick” to find the source of these massive attacks. In the process of their investigation, they determined the attacks coincided with visits to the sites by someone using IP addresses belonging to Savvis (NASDAQ: SVVS), a global Internet services company providing hosting and network services to major corporations and governments. Our source cautioned that this evidence is not conclusive because it’s theoretically possible to ‘spoof’ a server into logging the IP address of a terminal different than the terminal that actually visited the site. Though, he pointed out, that ‘IP (address) spoofing’ would require significant technical capabilities that could not easily be accomplished with commercially available software.

While it’s possible the visits by terminals using Savvis IP addresses at the time of the attacks are either coincidental or perhaps ‘spoofed,’ EvilEsq has learned that Richard S. Warley, a Savvis Managing Director is married to Seamus Hatch’s eldest sister, Sarah. It remains an open question whether Savvis was in any way involved in the cyber attacks. That said, they certainly have the capability accomplish such a feat either directly or using surrogates.

According to Heller Ehrman’s website, Larry Weeks, who joined Heller Ehrman’s Venture Law Practice Group in 2005, counts Redpoint Ventures as one of his clients. Heller Ehrman, Venture Law Group Associate, Blake Ilstrup alleges in his Heller Ehrman biography that he’s worked with Redpoint Ventures in some capacity. Redpoint, is Scribd’s most prominent venture capital backer having provided the early stage company $3.5 million of first stage venture financing in the Spring 2007. And it’s highly likely Scribd will require incremental funding soon. Conceivably this could make the company susceptible to influence by either Heller Ehrman or Redpoint to remove our documents from their system. Certainly the folks at Redpoint are intelligent enough to understand that such a tactic would compromise Scribd’s position as a neutral player in the Internet document hosting and delivery sphere—bringing with it negative publicity. Therefore, it doesn’t make sense they’d collude with Heller Ehrman, Marcia Bruggeman Hatch (a Heller Ehrman Shareholder) or Seamus Hatch of Aran Strategic Finance to pressure Scribd’s scribds to effect the removal of our documents. Then again Heller Ehrman Et and Al are known to use all available means to silence those critical of their illegal, unethical and immoral practices.

EvilEsq intends to continue to cover this story as it develops. Any information provided by third parties will of course be treated in confidence.

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

Lee H. Benson

On this date in the Golden State, the illustrious State Bar of California, reproved Lee H. Benson. age 54, of Porter Ranch, California. That means they criticized him. Gave him a sharp rebuke! » » read more

Thursday, June 19, 2008

Robert Victor Masenga

On this date in the Golden State (was but they're almost out of cash) Robert Victor Masenga (CA-62020) was suspended by the State Bar of California for two years. The “Bar” stayed his suspension (i.e., he’s really not suspended but the “Bar” wants to make his "discipline" look harsh) and placed him on probation for five years with a 90-day actual suspension. Mr. Masenga was “ordered” to make restitution to his victims (clients in lawyer parlance) » » read more

Saturday, June 7, 2008

Mississippi Dickie

The Mississippi Bar Association got ahead of themselves by filing a complaint with the State’s Supreme Court to have infamous barrister Dickie Skruggs relieved of his license to practice law after he plead guilty to conspiring to bribe a judge— a felony even when committed by a lawyer. According to the Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal, the unabashed Skruggs filed a motion to have the Mississippi Bar’s complaint dismissed because the court has yet to accept his plea agreement and therefore he’s been deprived of due process. How audacious of the Bar!

Does Mississippi Dickie really believe he has a chance to retain his law license? Perhaps. In New York, for instance, a lawyer is not subject to automatic disbarment for pleading guilty to a felony in a court other than a New York State court. Ahhhh! Federal courts don’t apply. Skruggs’ plea was entered in the U.S. District Court of Northern Mississippi. Are there similar provisions in Mississippi law relating to the regulation of lawyers? There must be.

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Steven Randall Smith

On this date in the Golden State (was but they're almost out of cash) the State "Bar" of California found that Steven Randall Smith (CA-160549), 47, of Sacramento, failed to competently perform legal services, when he filed a suit on behalf of a client in a personal injury matter, did not serve the defendant timely, and abandoned the case without informing his client or the court. The client hired a new lawyer but could not reinstate the case, apparently leaving the client without remedies. »» read more

Sunday, May 4, 2008

Debra Lynn Koven

On this date in the Golden State, Ms. Debra Lynn Koven (CA-149983), of Manhattan Beach was suspended by the State Bar of California for one year. Her “crime” it appears was zealously representing a client when she requested that two appellate justices (Gawds– California is a PC State) recuse themselves on the ground of bias. What? Gawds biased? Never! The Gawds found her guilty of two counts of criminal contempt and fined her $2,000. » » read more

Friday, January 4, 2008

Bincy Y. Abraham

On this date, in the Garden State, the Supreme Court of New Jersey suspended Bincy Y. Abraham for improperly engaging in dual representation of seller and buyer in a real estate transaction and because of her ongoing relationship with the corporate seller and for improperly allowing the seller to direct and regulate Bincy's "professional" "judgment." » » read more

Thursday, December 6, 2007

Scott R. Baron

On this date, in the Garden State, the Supreme Court of New Jersey disbarred Scott R. Baron when he admitted that he could not successfully defend pending disciplinary charges alleging the knowing misappropriation of more than $400,000 in client trust funds when he was employed as in-house counsel with a corporation for which he conducted two real estate closings. » » read more

Sunday, December 2, 2007

California Bar Complaint Against Miles Ehrlich

Parties mentioned in this post: Scott Drexel, State Bar of California, Audit and Review Office of the Cheif Trial Counsel, Lisa Stowe, Miles Frederick Ehrlich, a/k/a Miles Ehrlich, Miles F Ehrlich, Ramsey-Ehrlich, Heller Ehrman, Seamus Hatch, Michael Bock a/k/a Mike Bock, Michael D. Bock, Douglas Bock, Doug Bock, Michael Douglas Bock, Marcia Hatch a/k/a Marcia A Hatch, Marcia Ann Hatch, Marcia Bruggeman, Marcia Bruggeman Hatch, Marsha Bruggeman, Marsha Hatch, Marsha Ann Bruggeman, Marsha Bruggeman Hatch, Aran Strategic Finance, Barra Partners, Heller Ehrman, Venture Law Group » » read more

Document Link: Barra Capital

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

John K. Conner, Esquire

On this date, in the Garden State, the Supreme Court of New Jersey reprimanded John K. Conner as a result of his "negligent" misappropriation of clients' trust funds in two matters due to his poor accounting practices involving the inadvertent deposit of client funds into his business account instead of his trust account » » read more

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Basil D. Beck, Jr.

On this date, in the Garden State, the Supreme Court of New Jersey disbarred Basil D. Beck, Jr. for settling a client’s personal injury matter without the client’s consent and failing to cooperate with disciplinary authorities during the investigation and processing of this matter. » » read more

Tuesday, October 2, 2007

Gary D. Barton, Esquire

On this date, in the Garden State, the Supreme Court of New Jersey reprimanded Gary D. Barton for engaging in a conflict of interest by filing a civil complaint in which he represented both the driver and passenger in a motor vehicle accident. The Respondent also grossly neglected the case and failed to keep the clients reasonably informed about the status of the matter. » » read more

Wednesday, September 5, 2007

Jose M. Cameron, Esquire

On this date, in the Garden State, the Supreme Court of New Jersey admonished Jose M. Cameron for grossly neglecting a personal injury matter and failing to act diligently by permitting the complaint to be dismissed twice, but only once taking steps to have it reinstated, three years after the dismissal. Moreover, the Senor Cameron failed to disclose to his client that the complaint had been dismissed twice. » » read more

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Louis A. Colaguori

On this date, in the Garden State, the Supreme Court of New Jersey disbarred Louis A. Colaguori for knowingly misappropriating clients’ trust funds in an amount exceeding $500,000. » » read more

Tuesday, July 3, 2007

Richard G. Birchall

On this date, in the Garden State, the Supreme Court of New Jersey disbarred Richard G. Birchall for knowingly misappropriating trust funds when he wrote $235,000 of checks to himself, his family members and an unspecified number of his personal creditors against funds which had been deposited for the benefit of one client. » » read more

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

Azama A. Bilqiys

On this date, in the Garden State, the Supreme Court of New Jersey disbarred Azama A. Bilqiys for knowingly misappropriating over $5,000 of clients’ trust funds, knowingly offering false evidence in the form of altered bank statements to disciplinary authorities, knowingly making false statements of material fact to disciplinary authorities and making misrepresentations to disciplinary authorities. » » read more

Wednesday, May 9, 2007

Chaim Berglas, Esq

On this date, in the Garden State, the Supreme Court of New Jersey suspended Chaim Berglas as a result of discipline imposed in the State of New York arising out of the use of runners who made referrals in over 200 cases and for encouraging clients to file immigration affidavits containing false addresses in nine separate matters. » » read more

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

David W. Boyer, Esquire *** ADMONISHED ***

On this date, in the Garden State, the Supreme Court of New Jersey admonished David W. Boyer for failing to have a written fee agreement with an estate client. » » read more

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Michael L. Block, Esquire *** SUSPENDED ***

On this date, in the Garden State, the Supreme Court of New Jersey suspended Michael L. Block for lack of diligence in 14 matters including failing to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter, failing to promptly deliver funds to a client, failing to provide a written retainer agreement, providing financial assistance to a client in connection with pending litigation, failing to maintain a trust account; failing to protect a client’s interest on termination of the representation by not promptly returning property belonging to the client, failing to withdraw as counsel if the lawyer’s mental condition impairs the lawyer’s ability to represent the client and failing to cooperate with disciplinary authorities during the investigation of 13 of these matters. » » read more

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Michael J. Buonopane, Esquire *** DISBARRED ***

On this date, in the Garden State, the Supreme Court of New Jersey disbarred Michael J. Buonopane as a result of his guilty plea in the Superior Court of New Jersey to count two of an indictment charging him and one of his non-legal businesses, Mr. Good Lube, Inc., with misapplication of entrusted property, a second-degree offense (N.J.S.A. 2C:21-15); count eleven, charging him and Mr. Good Lube 10 Minute Oil Change, Inc. with failure to file corporate business tax returns, a third-degree offense (N.J.S.A. 54:52-8); and count twenty-five, charging him and many of his businesses with misapplication of entrusted property, a second-degree offense (N.J.S.A. 2C:21-15). » » read more

Tuesday, December 5, 2006

Stephen M. Brett

On this date, in the Garden State, the Supreme Court of New Jersey suspended Stephen M. Brett as a result of his receiving public reprimands in the State of Maine and his suspension for one year in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. » » read more

Wednesday, December 14, 2005

Stephen Chukumba

On this date, in the Garden State, the Supreme Court of New Jersey, disbarred Stephen Chukumba (by consent) (185 N.J. 403) when he admitted that he could not successfully defend pending disciplinary charges alleging the knowing misappropriation of clients’ trust funds. » » read more

Ralph P. Allocca

On this date in the Garden State, the Supreme Court of New Jersey censured Ralph P. Allocca for failing to advise the sellers’ attorney that his clients did not bring sufficient funds to closing to allow him to pay off the mortgage as required. As a result of Ralph’s misconduct, a foreclosure action that had been stayed was reinstituted. Ralph also made a material misrepresentation to a disciplinary investigator during the course of this matter. » » read more

Tuesday, December 13, 2005

Louis A. Capazzi, Jr., Esquire *** SUSPENDED ***

This post has been relocated to: EvilEsq.com

On this date, in the Garden State, the Supreme Court of New Jersey suspended Louis A. Capazzi, Jr. for committing the third degree crime of altering evidence, in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:5-1 and N.J.S.A. 2C:28-6. Specifically, Capazzi, who owned and operated Atlantic Bail Bondsman, coerced a bounty hunter to fabricate an inflated receipt for expenses incurred in the apprehension of a fugitive, who had “jumped” bail. By his actions, Capazzi sought to defraud the fugitive out of additional unwarranted expenses that she would be required to pay to Atlantic. » » read more

Tuesday, December 6, 2005

Philip V. Toronto

Reprimanded on December 6, 2005 (185 N.J. 399) for negligently misappropriating $59,000 in clients’ trust funds and failing to maintain proper trust and business account records as required by R.1:21-6. Michael J. Sweeney appeared before the DRB for the OAE and respondent waived appearance. This matter was discovered solely as a result of the Trust Overdraft Notification Program. The respondent was previously disciplined: Reprimanded in 1997.

Harvey H. Rothman

Reprimanded on December 6, 2005 (185 N.J. 396) for exhibiting gross neglect, negligent misappropriation of client trust funds, failing to maintain proper trust and business account records, engaging in an improper business transaction with a client and failing to properly supervise a non-lawyer. Janice L. Richter appeared before the DRB for the OAE and respondent appeared pro se. This matter was discovered solely as a result of the Trust Overdraft Notification Program.

Fernando Regojo

Reprimanded on December 6, 2005 (185 N.J. 395) for negligently misappropriating clients’ trust funds, commingling personal and clients’ funds and failing to promptly deliver client funds. Michael J. Sweeney appeared before the DRB for the OAE and Joseph P. Castiglia appeared for the respondent. The respondent has been previously disciplined: Reprimanded in 2001 and reprimanded in 2004.

Carl D. Gensib

This post has been relocated to: [EvilEsq.com]

Charles R. Thomas

Censured on December 6, 2005 (185 N.J. 394) for conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. While serving as the Clerk of the Passaic County Board of Chosen Freeholders and County Treasurer, respondent lent a motor pool vehicle to a Passaic County Juvenile Detention Center maintenance worker to commute to work, an improper use of the vehicle. Respondent further knew that the worker did not possess a valid driver’s license. After the worker was involved in an accident, respondent counseled the worker and his supervisor to lie to public officials and the respondent did the same. Richard J. Engelhardt appeared before the DRB for the OAE and respondent waived appearance.

Wendy E. Neggers

Suspended for three months on December 6, 2005 (185 N.J. 397) for conduct arising out of a two-count Accusation charging her with unlawfully and knowingly or purposely possessing a controlled dangerous substance, heroin, Schedule I, N.J.S.A. 2C:35-10a(1); and unlawfully and knowingly or purposely possessing a controlled dangerous substance, heroin, Schedule I, in a quantity of less than ½ ounce, with the intent to distribute same, N.J.S.A. 2C:35-5b(3). Respondent was subsequently accepted into pretrial intervention and admitted her offense in this disciplinary proceeding. Lee A. Gronikowski appeared before the DRB for the OAE and respondent appeared pro se.

Warren R. Kraft

Disbarred on December 6, 2005 (185 N.J. 341) for knowingly misappropriating clients’ trust funds. John McGill, III appeared before the Supreme Court for the OAE and Michael P. Ambrosio represented the respondent. The respondent was previously disciplined: Temporarily suspended in 1999; admonished in 2001, reprimanded in 2001 and again admonished in 2001.

Charles C. Staropoli

Disbarred on December 6, 2005 (185 N.J. 401) based upon a one-year suspension in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The Supreme Court found that the respondent knowingly misappropriated law firm fees which he received as an associate. The respondent knew that those fees were to be divided between the firm and the associates, but nevertheless, placed the $9,000 check into a personal bank account and then disbursed 2/3 to the client and 1/3 as a legal fee, which he retained. Richard J. Engelhardt appeared before the Supreme Court for the OAE and respondent failed to appear.

Thursday, December 1, 2005

Joseph J. Haldusiewicz

Suspended for six months effective December 1, 2005 (185 N.J. 278) as a result of a guilty plea in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County, to a one count accusation charging him with the fourth degree crime of endangering the welfare of a child (possession of child pornography), in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:24- 4(b)(5)(b). The respondent’s actions occurred while he was serving as a deputy attorney general in the Department of Law and Public Safety. Richard J. Engelhardt appeared before the Supreme Court for the OAE and respondent appeared pro se.

Herbert F. Lawrence

Suspended for six months effective December 1, 2005 (??? N.J. ???) for, in his own bankruptcy and matrimonial proceeding, engaged in numerous instances of fraud, misrepresentation and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice by concealing assets from his wife and from the courts. John McGill III appeared before the DRB for the OAE and John T. Mullaney, Jr. represented the respondent. The respondent was previously disciplined: Privately reprimanded in 1985.

Wednesday, November 30, 2005

Thomas J. Coleman, III

Reprimanded on November 30, 2005 (185 N.J. 280) as a result of his suspension in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for, among other things, signing hundreds of pleadings as an attorney of record when he was not licensed to do so and receiving more than $7,000 for these services. The respondent was ineligible to practice law in Pennsylvania for a period of nine years. Richard J. Engelhardt appeared before the Supreme Court for the OAE and John D. Borbi represented the respondent.

Tuesday, November 29, 2005

Anthony J. Briguglio

Disbarred on November 29, 2005 (185 N.J. 335) based upon his disbarment in the State of New York after pleading guilty in the Supreme Court of New York, County of Westchester, to an Information charging him with engaging in a scheme to defraud in the first degree, a violation of New York Penal Law §190.65. In the respondent’s plea he admitted that, over a three year period after his disbarment in New York, he continued to solicit new business, collected legal fees, and made court appearances on behalf of clients in 35 different legal matters. Richard J. Engelhardt appeared before the Supreme Court for the OAE and respondent failed to appear.

Diane K. Murray

Reprimanded on November 29, 2005 (185 N.J. 340) for negligent misappropriation, trust account recordkeeping violations and failing to supervise employees that resulted in the unexplained misuse of client trust funds. Nitza I. Blasini appeared before the DRB for the OAE and Edward DePascale represented the respondent. Respondent was previously disciplined: Admonished in 1997 and again in 2000.

Tuesday, November 15, 2005

Lee D. Gottesman

Censured on November 15, 2005 on a certified record (185 N.J. 318) for failing to act diligently and to communicate with a client, misrepresentations to the client and failing to cooperate with disciplinary authorities during the investigation and processing of the matter. Joseph D. Grisanti appeared before the DRB for District IIIA and respondent failed to appear.

Henry J Aratow

Censured on a certified record (185 N.J. 319) for grossly neglecting a client matter, misrepresenting to the client that a complaint had been served and failing to cooperate with disciplinary authorities during the investigation and processing of this matter. Kurt W. Krauss appeared before the DRB for District X and respondent failed to appear.

Wednesday, November 9, 2005

Carl C. Belgrave

Admonished (Unreported) for failing to state in writing the basis of his legal fee in a real estate matter and failing to maintain proper cash receipts and cash disbursement journals as required by record keeping rule 1:21-6. Walton W. Kingsbery III appeared before the DRB for the OAE and respondent appeared pro se.

Monday, November 7, 2005

James C. Conlon

Reprimanded on November 7, 2005 (185 N.J. 283) for preparing a will for an elderly and infirm client with little family in which the respondent and his wife received all but $45,000 of a $410,000 estate. Bill R. Fenstemaker appeared before the DRB for District XII and James J. Byrnes represented the respondent.

Thursday, November 3, 2005

Queen Esther Payton

Admonished by discipline by consent on November 3, 2005 (Unreported) for practicing law while ineligible between September 2003 and August 2004 and also failing to cooperate with disciplinary authorities during the investigation of this matter. Jane M. Coviello appeared before the DRB for District XII and respondent appeared pro se.

Tuesday, November 1, 2005

Ronald M. Sims

Censured on November 1, 2005 (185 N.J. 276) based upon respondent’s conviction in municipal court of the petty disorderly persons offense of harassment, in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4(b), which involved inappropriately touching his secretary. Richard J. Engelhardt appeared before the DRB for the OAE and respondent appeared pro se.

John S. Conroy, IV

Reprimanded on November 1, 2005 (??? N.J. ???) for negligently misappropriating $2,800 from his trust account caused by his failing to maintain trust account records in accordance with R.1:21-6. Melissa A. Czartoryski appeared before the DRB for the OAE and respondent waived appearance. This matter was discovered solely as a result of the Random Audit Compliance Program.

Richard M. Onorevole

Suspended for six months effective November 1, 2005 on a certified record (185 N.J. 169) for grossly neglecting an estate matter, failing to timely file the estate tax returns, failing to communicate with a client and failing to cooperate with disciplinary authorities in processing the matter. Janet L. Pisansky appeared before the DRB for District X and respondent failed to appear. The respondent was previously disciplined: Admonished in 1994; reprimanded in 1996 and reprimanded in 2001.

Howard S. Diamond

Suspended for one year effective November 1, 2005 (185 N.J. 171) for closing his office and failing to notify one client that he had done so, essentially abandoning the client; he also failed to advise the client that her lawsuit had been dismissed with prejudice. In a second case, respondent failed to act diligently and never resolved a client’s automobile accident. He also failed to cooperate with disciplinary authorities during the investigation and processing of the matter. Sheldon Simon appeared before the DRB for District X and Albert B. Jeffers, Jr. represented the respondent. The respondent was previously disciplined: Admonished and reprimanded, both in 2002.

Tanya E. Lawrence

Disbarred on November 1, 2005 (??? N.J. ???) for knowingly misappropriating over $5,000 in personal injury settlements from clients. Janice L. Richter appeared before the Supreme Court for the OAE and respondent appeared pro se. The respondent was previously disciplined: Suspended for three months in 2002 and admonished in 2003.

Jean D. Larosiliere

Disbarred on November 1, 2005 on a certified record (185 N.J. 279) for knowingly misappropriating clients’ trust funds and abandoning his law practice. John McGill III appeared before the Supreme Court for the OAE and respondent failed to appear. The respondent was previously disciplined: Temporarily suspended in 2002 and admonished in 2003.

Joseph J. Larosa

Reprimanded on November 1, 2005 (185 N.J. 275) for charging excessive fees in nine personal injury matters. Michael S. Rothmel, Michael Taylor and Michael A. Bonamassa appeared before the DRB for District IIIB and Joel B. Korin represented the respondent. The respondent was previously disciplined: Admonished in 2003.

Jay R. Kolmar

Disbarred on November 1, 2005 (185 N.J. 273) based upon his disbarment in the State of New York for knowingly misappropriating a total of over $161,000 from his law firm’s petty cash account and then misrepresenting that the funds would be used for real estate transactions. Richard J. Engelhardt appeared before the Supreme Court for the OAE and respondent waived appearance.

Friday, October 21, 2005

David S. Silverman

Suspended for one year effective October 21, 2005 (185 N.J. 133) for unethically compensating a chiropractor for referring clients to him during a period that spanned from 1997 through 2001. Lee A. Gronikowski appeared before the Supreme Court for the OAE and Robert E. Margulies represented respondent.

Tuesday, October 18, 2005

H. Alton Neff

Censured on October 18, 2005 (185 N.J. 241) for engaging in “abominable” conduct at a disputed real estate closing by unilaterally aborting the transaction; without authority, seizing his adversary’s entire file; extracting documents from it and refusing to identify those items and to return them to the buyer’s attorney. Respondent also threatened the attorney with criminal prosecution if he and his clients failed to leave the office building without the records. Jeff J. Horn appeared before the DRB for District IIIA and John F. Russo, Sr. represented the respondent. The respondent was previously disciplined: Privately reprimanded in 1987.

George Osei

Censured on October 18, 2005 (185 N.J. 249) as a result of a guilty plea to the third-degree crime of criminal mischief, in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:17-3a(2). The respondent admitted intentionally causing $72,000 worth of damage to a house that he had lost through foreclosure seven days prior to the date he was to be evicted. Richard J. Engelhardt appeared before the DRB for the OAE and Dominick J. Aprile appeared for respondent.

Elliot H. Gourvitz

Reprimanded on October 18, 2005 (185 N.J. 243) for engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice by repeatedly disregarding several court orders requiring him to satisfy his financial obligations to his former secretary, an elderly cancer survivor, who sued him successfully for employment discrimination when he refused to allow her to return to work after she had recovered from cancer surgery that disfigured her face. Robert J. Logan appeared before the DRB for District XII and respondent appeared pro se.

John H. Mckeon, Jr.

Suspended for three months on October 18, 2005 (185 N.J. 247) as a result of respondent’s guilty plea to the third-degree offense of possession of cocaine, a violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:35-10a(1). Richard J. Engelhardt appeared before the DRB for the OAE and Katherine D. Hartman represented the respondent.

Robert H. Leiner

Reprimanded on October 18, 2005 (185 N.J. 246) for grossly neglecting a matrimonial matter and making numerous misrepresentations to the client that the matter was “scheduled for court” when, in fact, it was not, and for delivering to the client a $68,000 trust account check, ultimately confessing to her that the case did not settle and, in fact, he had never filed any application with the court on her behalf. Michael J. Sweeney appeared before the DRB for the OAE and respondent waived appearance. The respondent was previously disciplined: Temporarily suspended in 2005.

Monday, October 17, 2005

Barry A. Perlow

Disbarred by consent on October 17, 2005 (185 N.J. 240) for knowingly misappropriating clients’ trust funds. Walton W. Kingsbery III represented the OAE and Jay H. Greenblatt represented the respondent. This case was discovered solely by the Trust Overdraft Notification Program.

Wednesday, October 5, 2005

Thomas A. Giamanco

Censured on October 5, 2005 (185 N.J. 174) for failing to file a bankruptcy petition until 15 months after he had been retained, failing to withdraw from representation after he was discharged by the client and, when sued by the client, engaging in threats and intimidation in order to have the client discontinue the lawsuit. Ellen K. Bromsen appeared before the DRB for District IIA and Catherine M. Elston represented the respondent. The respondent was previously disciplined: Reprimanded in 1999.

John F. Wise

Reprimanded on October 5, 2005 (185 N.J. 167) for grossly neglecting a bankruptcy matter by failing to take action to release funds unnecessarily held in escrow by a title company. Joel D. Fierstien appeared before the DRB for District VB and Lewis B. Cohn represented the respondent.

Stuart P. Schlem

Suspended for three months on October 5, 2005 (185 N.J. 173) for grossly neglecting a client matter, misrepresenting the status of the case as pending when it had been dismissed and failing to return an overpayment to his client. R. Diane Aifer appeared before the DRB for District IX and Emil S. Cuccio represented the respondent. The respondent was previously disciplined: Privately reprimanded in 1994; reprimanded in 2000 and suspended for three months in 2003.

Wednesday, September 28, 2005

Mitchell L. Singer

Disbarred on September 28, 2005 (185 N.J. 163) based upon his disbarment in the State of New York, arising out of his guilty plea to charges of grand larceny in the third degree, in violation of New York Penal Law §155.35. Factually, the respondent failed to maintain a real estate escrow in the amount of $85,000, which was to be used for his clients’ rental payments. Richard J. Engelhardt appeared before the Supreme Court for the OAE and Michael S. Richmond appeared for the respondent. The respondent was previously disciplined: Temporarily suspended in 2004.

Larry J. Mcclure

Disbarred on September 28, 2005 on a certified record (185 N.J. 167) for knowingly misappropriating clients’ trust funds, practicing law while suspended, making false statements of material fact to a disciplinary authority, failing to cooperate with a disciplinary authority and committing a criminal act. Michael J. Sweeney appeared before the Supreme Court for the OAE and respondent failed to appear. The respondent was previously disciplined: Admonished in 1999; suspended for six months in 2003; suspended for six months in 2004; suspended for one year in 2005.

Thursday, September 22, 2005

Kaykay E. Davis-Daniels

monished on September 22, 2005 (Unreported) for conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice when, as personal representative in an estate matter in South Carolina, she failed to respond to many deadlines set by the court for filing an inventory and failed to appear or explain her non-appearance to the court in a scheduled hearing to explain why she had not performed her duties. Julia D. Drescher appeared before the DRB for District IX and Kevin E. Daniels represented the respondent.

Monday, September 19, 2005

Barry A. Hoffberg

Reprimanded on September 19, 2005 (185 N.J. 131) for negligently misappropriating clients’ trust funds, grossly neglecting a client matter and practicing law while ineligible for failure to pay the annual attorney registration assessment. Lee A. Gronikowski appeared before the DRB for the OAE and respondent appeared pro se.

George E. Kersey

Reprimanded on September 19, 2005 (185 N.J. 130) following his disbarment in the State of New Hampshire for having violated RPC 3.4(c) by disobeying an obligation under the rules of a tribunal and practicing law while suspended in that state. The New Jersey Supreme Court held that a reprimand was the appropriate discipline in New Jersey. Richard J. Engelhardt appeared before the DRB for the OAE and respondent appeared pro se. The respondent was previously disciplined: Reprimanded in 2002.

Steven V. Podolsky

Admonished on September 19, 2005 (Unreported) for filing a civil complaint during a seven- month period when he was ineligible to practice law for non-payment of the annual registration assessment. Richard A. Deutchman represented District VIII before the DRB and James D. Nichols represented the respondent.

Wednesday, September 14, 2005

Alan M. Darnell

Disbarred by consent on September 14, 2005 (185 N.J. 129) based upon the knowing misappropriation of client and law firm funds by charging certain personal expenses to the law firm. Michael J. Sweeney represented the OAE and Robert A. Weir, Jr. represented the respondent.

Monday, September 12, 2005

Ande R. Abraha

Disbarred on a certified record (185 N.J. 128) for knowingly misappropriating over $6,000 of client trust funds given to him in connection with a real estate transaction.  The responden commingled trust funds in his personal checking account and then invaded them by issuing personal checks, debit card purchases and ATM withdrawals for his own private purposes.  Failed to appear for disbarrment hearing.

Wednesday, September 7, 2005

Howard M. Dorian

Suspended for six months on September 7, 2005 on a certified record (185 N.J. 236) for grossly neglecting defense of a lawsuit, allowing entry of a default, failing to vacate the default, and failing to file a counterclaim advancing the client’s affirmative claim for damages. The respondent also settled the litigation from his own funds without informing the client or obtaining the client’s consent, which constituted a misrepresentation. Richard G. Potter represented District IIB before the DRB and respondent failed to appear. The respondent was previously disciplined: Admonished in 1995; reprimanded in 2001 and 2003; and suspended for three months in 2005.

Spiro T. Michals

Admonished on September 7, 2005 (185 N.J. 126) for negligently misappropriating client trust funds, commingling personal and client funds and failing to maintain records as required by R.1:21-6. Michael J. Sweeney appeared before the DRB for the OAE and respondent appeared pro se. This case was discovered solely by the Trust Overdraft Notification Program.

Monday, August 22, 2005

Frederick Fitchett III

Suspended for three months effective August 22, 2005 (184 N.J. 289) for engaging in a conflict of interest by continuing to represent a public entity after switching law firms and becoming associated with another party in the same litigation. Melissa Czartoryski appeared before the Supreme Court for the OAE and respondent appeared pro se. Respondent was previously disciplined: Reprimanded in 1999.

Monday, August 15, 2005

Vincent M. Yacavino

Suspended for six months effective August 15, 2005 (184 N.J. 389) for engaging in unethical conduct in connection with his own personal divorce matter by engaging in a pattern of filing pleadings after the identical claims had been dismissed, threatening to file criminal charges and ethics grievances in an effort to remove a judge and defense counsel from the litigation and engaging in a pattern of conduct showing disrespect, abuse and contempt toward judges and adversaries. G. Glennon Troublefield appeared before the DRB for District VC and respondent appeared pro se.

Scott J. Wood

Suspended for three months effective August 15, 2005 (184 N.J. 387) for failing to act diligently and failing to communicate with clients in two separate matters. Respondent also failed to cooperate with disciplinary authorities. Warren S. Wolf appeared before the DRB for District IIIB and Robin E. Ecchevarria represented the respondent. The respondent was previously disciplined: Admonished in 1999, reprimanded in 2000 and censured in 2003.

Wednesday, August 10, 2005

Mary H. Richardson

Suspended for six months effective August 10, 2005 (184 N.J. 288) for misconduct as house counsel in family-owned companies, including misrepresentation and deceit in court proceedings, involving lying and engaging in a recurring pattern of “conscious misstatements under oath.” John J. Janasie appeared before the DRB for the OAE and Peter A. Ouda represented the respondent.

Donald M. Rohan

Suspended for three months effective August 10, 2005 on a certified record (184 N.J. 287) for grossly neglecting three client matters while working as an associate in a large law firm. In one case, respondent made misrepresentations to the court and to his adversary when he purportedly settled the case in which he had no authority to do so; in another matter he knowingly misrepresented to his supervisor that he had filed a complaint on behalf of the client; and, in a third matter, he appeared at the call and settled the case even though he had no authority to do so. Walton W. Kingsbery III represented District VA before the DRB and respondent failed to appear.

Thursday, July 28, 2005

Larissa A. Pelc

Admonished on July 28, 2005 (Unreported) for failing to refund a portion of a fee that had not been earned after her services were terminated. Matthew J. Jeon appeared before the DRB for District IIB and respondent appeared pro se.

Tuesday, July 26, 2005

Nancy I. Oxfeld

Reprimanded on July 26, 2005 (??? N.J. ???) for failing to act with diligence and failing to communicate with the client while representing her in connection with a pension plan matter. Christopher J. Dalton appeared before the DRB for District VA and respondent appeared pro se. Respondent was previously disciplined: Admonished in 1995 and 2001.

Friday, July 22, 2005

Nicholas H. Mundy

Disbarred by Consent on July 22, 2005 (184 N.J. 388) for pleading guilty in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County, to one count of an indictment charging him with securities fraud in the third degree, in violation of N.J.S.A. 49:3-52(b), N.J.S.A. 49:3-70 and N.J.S.A. 2C:2-6. John J. Janasie represented the OAE and Steven D. Altman represented respondent.

Tuesday, July 19, 2005

Philip M. Morell

Thursday, July 7, 2005

Hugo L. Moras

Reprimanded on July 7, 2005 (184 N.J. 232) for failing to communicate with a client in a real estate matter and, also, failing to set forth the basis or rate of the legal fee to be charged as required by court rules. Denise M. Carter appeared before the DRB for District VB and respondent appeared pro se. The respondent was previously disciplined: Suspended for six months in 1993, temporarily suspended in 1996 and again in 1997, and reprimanded in 1997.

Tuesday, June 28, 2005

Githaiga Daniel Ramsey

On this date in the "Golden" state, Githaiga Daniel Ramsey, tendered his resignation to the State Bar of California with charges pending.

The charges in this case included twenty-two acts of "misconduct" including eight counts of "moral turpitude," including misappropriation, fraud, fabricating documents and entering into improper business transactions with a client » » read more

Tuesday, June 21, 2005

Craig E. Parles

Disbarred by consent on June 21, 2005 (184 N.J. 69) for knowingly misappropriating clients’ trust funds in an amount exceeding $24,000. Michael J. Sweeney represented the OAE and Joseph P. Castiglia represented respondent. This case was discovered solely by the Random Audit Program.

Friday, June 17, 2005

Wayne D. Lonstein

Admonished on June 17, 2005 (Unreported) for failing to maintain a bona fide law office in the State of New Jersey as of May 2003. Timothy J. Little appeared before the DRB for District VIII and Michael Boldt represented the respondent.

Tuesday, June 14, 2005

Joseph M. Barry

Disbarred by consent (183 N.J. 553) as a result of a guilty plea in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey to four counts of making cash payments to reward a government official, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 666(a)(2) and 2. Richard J. Engelhardt represented the OAE before the DRB and James Plaisted represented the respondent. The respondent was previously disciplined: Temporarily suspended on September 7, 2004.

Tuesday, June 7, 2005

Kieran P. Hughes

Reprimanded on June 7, 2005 (183 N.J. 473) for, in three matters, exhibiting a lack of diligence, failing to communicate with clients and failing to protect clients’ interests on termination of the representation. Additionally, in one case, the respondent abandoned his client. Kenneth B. Rotter appeared before the DRB for District XII and respondent failed to appear.

John S. Angelucci

Reprimanded (183 N.J. 472) for being convicted of obstructing the administration of law or other governmental function, in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:29-1(a), a disorderly persons offense, which essentially involved respondent’s resisting arrest. Richard J. Engelhardt appeared before the DRB for the OAE and respondent failed to appear.

Alan Zark

Reprimanded on June 7, 2005 (183 N.J. 475) for improperly refusing to disburse fees to a mortgage broker after closing of title in a real estate matter until 19 months after the closing. In a second matter, respondent failed to safeguard funds and misrepresented, on closing documents, the disbursements made in connection with that transaction. Nitza I. Blasini appeared before the DRB for the OAE and respondent appeared pro se. The respondent was previously disciplined: Admonished in 2005.

Thursday, May 26, 2005

Thomas M. Keeley-Cain

Admonished on May 26, 2005 (Unreported) for grossly neglecting a litigated matter by allowing a pleading to be dismissed without advising the client that its answer was subject to dismissal and by failing to file an answer on behalf of a co-defendant, which resulted in the entry of a default. Pamela Adriano Moy appeared before the DRB for District IIIB and Teri S. Lodge represented the respondent.

Wednesday, May 25, 2005

Muhammad Bashir

Admonished (Unreported) for failing to comply with court deadlines in five separate criminal representations, resulting in orders of sanction against the respondent, which sanctions he failed to timely pay. Christopher M. Farella appeared before the DRB for District VA and Alan Dexter Bowman represented the respondent. The respondent was previously disciplined: Reprimanded in 1996.

Monday, May 23, 2005

Steven T. Muller

Reprimanded on May 23, 2005 (184 N.J. 293) for grossly neglecting a client’s matter, failing to communicate with a client and failing to set forth in writing the basis or rate of the fee as required by ethics rules. Lorraine Teleky- Petrella appeared before the DRB for District IIA and Michael P. Ambrosio represented the respondent. The respondent was previously disciplined: Privately reprimanded in 1989 and reprimanded in 1999.

Raymond L. Poling

Reprimanded on May 23, 2005 (184 N.J. 297) for representing buyers in real estate transactions where the clients used a title company in which the attorney had a financial interest and stood to earn a fee, all without obtaining required written waivers from the clients. Walton W. Kingsbery III appeared before the DRB for the OAE and Katherine Hartman represented the respondent. The respondent was previously disciplined: Temporarily suspended in 1989 and suspended for fourteen months in 1990.

Colin J. Flynn

Disbarred on a certified record on May 23, 2005 (184 N.J. 295) for knowingly misappropriating clients’ trust funds in a series of five client matters. Lee A. Gronikowski appeared before the Supreme Court for the OAE and respondent failed to appear. The respondent was previously disciplined: Temporarily suspended in 2003.

Roy R. Claps

Admonished on May 23, 2005 (Unreported) for negligently misappropriating clients’ trust funds over a period of years that was initially caused by a bank error. The law firm’s failure to properly reconcile delayed the detection of this problem. Nitza I. Blasini represented the OAE before the DRB and respondent appeared pro se. This matter was discovered solely as a result of the Trust Overdraft Notification Program.

H. Neil Broder

Reprimanded on May 23, 2005 (184 N.J. 295) for negligently misappropriating client trust funds at a real estate closing by drawing on a regular business account check given him by his clients’ business. Respondent also failed to maintain appropriate trust and business account records as required by R.1:21-6. John J. Janasie appeared before the DRB for the OAE and Kevin H. Michels represented the respondent. This case was discovered solely by the Trust Overdraft Notification Program.

Ronald W. Spevack

Admonished on May 23, 2005 (Unreported) for failing to explain a matter to his client to the extent reasonably necessary to enable the client to make an informed decision about the representation. Craig M. Terkowitz appeared before the DRB for District VIII and Pamela L. Brause represented the respondent. The respondent was previously disciplined: Reprimanded in 1997 and admonished in February 2005.

David C. Pennella

Admonished on May 23, 2005 (Unreported) for negligently misappropriating clients’ trust funds over a period of years that was initially caused by a bank error. The law firm’s failure to properly reconcile delayed the detection of this problem. Nitza I. Blasini represented the OAE before the DRB and respondent appeared pro se. This matter was discovered solely as a result of the Trust Overdraft Notification Program.

Cory J. Gilman

Admonished on May 23, 2005 (184 N.J. 298) for engaging in a conflict of interest when, as an associate, respondent prepared real estate contracts for the buyers in ten real estate transactions which included a provision that the buyers agreed to use a title company in which a partner of respondent’s law firm had an interest. Walton W. Kingsbery III appeared before the DRB for the OAE and Katherine Hartman represented the respondent.

John Charles Allen

Admonished (Unreported) for grossly neglecting a real estate foreclosure matter,resulting in dismissal of the case. Richard Galex appeared before the DRB for District VIII and respondent appeared pro se.

Thursday, May 19, 2005

David L. Kervick

Suspended for three months effective May 19, 2005 (185 N.J. 343) as a result of a guilty plea in the Superior Court of New Jersey to the disorderly persons offense of loitering with intent to obtain a controlled dangerous substance, in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:33-2.1. Richard J. Engelhardt appeared before the DRB for the OAE and Richard S. Lehrich appeared for the respondent. The respondent had been previously disciplined: Suspended for three months in 2002.

Wednesday, May 11, 2005

Daniel Ellis

Suspended for three months on a certified record on May 11, 2005 (183 N.J. 227) for failing to act diligently in a real estate transaction by not discharging the seller’s mortgage of record for one year after the closing, failing to communicate with the client, and failing to cooperate with disciplinary authorities. Harrison J. Gordon appeared before the Disciplinary Review Board for District VC and respondent failed to appear. The respondent was previously disciplined: Reprimanded in 1999; reprimanded in 2000; temporary suspension in 2003.

Louann K. Wonski

Reprimanded on a certified record on May 11, 2005 (184 N.J. 2) for failing to cooperate with disciplinary authorities during the investigation and processing of the matter. Janice L. Richter appeared before the Supreme Court for the OAE and Zulima Farber appeared for the respondent. The respondent was previously disciplined: Reprimanded in 2003 and temporarily suspended in 2004.

John P. Doyle

Reprimanded on May 11, 2005 (183 N.J. 233) for engaging in a conflict of interest by representing ARC Properties, Inc. before the Lakewood Township Committee, while ARC had matters pending in Brick Township, where respondent was the attorney for the planning board. Michael J. Sweeney appeared before the Disciplinary Review Board for the OAE and Kevin H. Michels appeared for the respondent. The respondent was previously disciplined: Privately reprimanded in 1985 and suspended for six months in 1996.

Tuesday, May 10, 2005

Michael F. Sassano

Disbarred by consent on May 10, 2005 (184 N.J. 1) for knowingly misappropriating over $250,000 of clients’ trust funds. Michael J. Sweeney represented the OAE and Barry D. Epstein represented the respondent. This case was discovered solely by the Random Audit Program. The respondent was previously disciplined: Temporarily suspended in 2003.

Tuesday, May 3, 2005

Patricia L. Johnson

Suspended for six months on a certified record on May 3, 2005 (183 N.J .222) for grossly neglecting a criminal matter, failing to communicate with the clients, and failing to cooperate with disciplinary authorities during the investigation and processing of this matter. Walton W. Kingsbery III appeared before the Supreme Court for the OAE and respondent failed to appear. The respondent was previously disciplined: Temporarily suspended in 2004.

Robert J. Handfuss

Disbarred on May 3, 2005 (183 N.J. 221) for grossly neglecting 17 separate client real estate transactions, failing to pay for title insurance in three cases and, in accordance with In re Kantor, 180 N.J. 226 (2004), exhibiting disrespect for the disciplinary system in failing to cooperate during the investigation and processing of this matter. Richard J. Engelhardt appeared before the Supreme Court for the OAE and respondent failed to appear. The respondent was previously disciplined: Reprimanded in 2000; suspended for three months in 2001; reprimanded in 2002 and suspended for one year in 2005.

Friday, April 29, 2005

Russell T. Kivler

Reprimanded on April 29, 2005 (183 N.J. 220) for grossly neglecting two of three matters entrusted to him by his clients, failing to communicate with the clients and failing to supervise a junior attorney who was assigned to the matters. Bruce Willard Clark appeared before the DRB for District XIII and respondent appeared pro se.

Allen C. Marra

Suspended for three years on April 29, 2005 (183 N.J. 260) for unethically engaging in the practice of law on three occasions after he was previously suspended from the practice of law. Additionally, the respondent filed an affidavit with the Supreme Court falsely stating that, during this prior period, he had refrained from the practice of law in any form. John McGill III appeared before the Supreme Court for the OAE and respondent appeared pro se. The respondent was previously disciplined: Privately reprimanded in 1992; suspended for three months in 1997; suspended for six months in 2002; suspended for three months in 2002 and suspended for one year in 2002.

A. Kenneth Weiner

Suspended for six months on a certified record on April 29, 2005 (183 N.J. 262) for grossly neglecting a litigation matter arising out of an estate, failing to supervise subordinate lawyers and misleading the clients for over a year that their matter was proceeding properly. Scott A. Krasny appeared before the DRB for District VII and respondent failed to appear. The respondent was previously disciplined: Privately reprimanded in 1988; publicly reprimanded in 1995; and temporarily suspended from practice in 2004.

Gerald M. Lynch

Reprimanded on a certified record on April 29, 2005 (183 N.J. 260) for failing to cooperate with disciplinary authorities during the investigation and processing of a grievance. Richard Galex appeared before the DRB for District VIII and respondent failed to appear. The respondent was previously disciplined: Admonished in 1999; temporarily suspended in 2003.

Ana L. Ventura

Admonished on a certified record on April 29, 2005 (Unreported) for failing to cooperate with disciplinary authorities during the investigation of an ethics grievance that was ultimately dismissed. Susan E. Champion appeared before the DRB for District XI and respondent failed to appear.

Monday, April 25, 2005

Howard M. Dorian

Suspended for three months on a certified record effective April 25, 2005 (183 N.J. 33) for grossly neglecting a personal injury action, failing to communicate with his client and failing to cooperate with disciplinary authorities. Richard G. Potter appeared before the DRB for District IIB and respondent failed to appear. The respondent was previously disciplined: Admonition in 1995; two reprimands in 2001 and 2003.

Richard J. Cohan

Admonished (Unreported) for negligently misappropriating clients’ trust funds and failing to maintain proper trust account records in accordance with R.1:21-6. Michael J. Sweeney appeared before the DRB for the OAE and Raymond S. Londa represented the respondent. This case was discovered solely by the Trust Overdraft Notification Program.

Friday, April 22, 2005

George J. Cotz

Suspended for six months effective April 22, 2005 (185 N.J. 330) for negligently misappropriating clients’ trust funds, borrowing funds from several clients without complying with the requirements of RPC 1.8(a) and failing to maintain proper trust and business account records. Lee A. Gronikowski appeared before the DRB for the OAE and Kim D. Ringler represented the respondent. This case was discovered solely by the Trust Overdraft Notification Program.

Tuesday, April 5, 2005

Frederick W. Hardt

Reprimanded on April 5, 2005 (183 N.J. 132) for engaging in a conflict of interest by simultaneously representing a private client before both the zoning board and the planning board in Pemberton Township, while at the same time representing the township itself as special counsel in connection with condemnation litigation. Carl N. Tripician appeared before the DRB for District I and Jeffrey I. Baron appeared for the respondent. The respondent was previously disciplined: Reprimanded in 1977.

Merri R. Lane

Suspended for three months on April 5, 2005 on a certified record (183 N.J. 209) for grossly neglecting a client’s matter, failing to communicate with the client, misrepresenting the status of the case to the client, improperly using a signature stamp on a trust account check and failing to cooperate with disciplinary authorities during the investigation of the matter. Walton W. Kingsbery III appeared before the DRB for the OAE and respondent failed to appear. The respondent was previously disciplined: Reprimanded in 1996.

Thursday, March 31, 2005

Charles B. Kushner

Disbarred by consent on March 31, 2005 (183 N.J. 130.) for pleading guilty in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey to 16 counts of assisting in the preparation of fraudulent partnership returns, in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. §7206(2), one count of witness retaliation, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. §1513(e) and (2) and one count of making false statements to the Federal Election Commission, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. §1001 and 2. Richard J. Engelhardt represented the OAE and Murray J. Laulicht represented the respondent. The respondent was previously disciplined: Temporarily suspended in 2004.

Tuesday, March 29, 2005

Jeffrey P. Lichtenstein

Disbarred on March 29, 2005 (183 N.J. 206) for his guilty plea in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County, to theft by deception (N.J.S.A. 2C:20- 4) and his admission that he knowingly misappropriated clients’ trust funds in the amount of approximately $27,000. Richard J. Engelhardt appeared before the Supreme Court for the OAE and respondent failed to appear. The respondent was previously disciplined: Temporarily suspended in 2004.

Anthony C. Nwaka

Disbarred on March 29, 2005 (183 N.J. 207) for forging clients’ endorsements on checks and knowingly misappropriating in excess of $35,000 in clients’ trust funds. Lee A. Gronikowski represented the OAE before the Supreme Court and respondent failed to appear. The respondent was previously disciplined: Suspended for three months in 2003 and three-month suspension in 2004.

Wednesday, March 23, 2005

David E. Wolfson

Suspended for one year effective March 23, 2005 and until reinstated in New York (182 N.J. 479) by reason of his disbarment in the State of New York for neglect of more than a dozen collection cases, failure to account for funds entrusted to him as a fiduciary and failure to promptly return funds to a client. Richard J. Engelhardt appeared before the DRB for the OAE and respondent waived appearance.

Anthony M. Supino

Suspended for three months effective March 23, 2005 (182 N.J. 530) for engaging in a pattern of rude and intimidating behavior towards judges, the court administrator and law enforcement authorities in his own personal divorce matter, and by either presenting or threatening to present criminal charges against his ex-wife, the court administrator and police officers in order to obtain an improper advantage in the custody and visitation matters. Anne Marie Kelly appeared before the DRB for District VA and respondent waived appearance.

Kathleen Scott Chasar

Suspended for three months effective March 23, 2005 (182 N.J 459) for filing a false certification with the court in her own personal divorce case in an attempt to mislead the court. Samuel M. Gaylord appeared before the DRB for District VII and respondent appeared pro se.

Tuesday, March 22, 2005

David T. Stoller

Reprimanded on March 22, 2005 (183 N.J. 24) for grossly neglecting a real estate closing and failing to record any of the documents for more than 4 ½ years; also, failing to maintain required records of the transaction for 7 years. Shereen C. Chen appeared before the DRB for District IV and respondent appeared pro se. The respondent was previously disciplined: Privately reprimanded in 1986.

Wednesday, March 16, 2005

E. Lorraine Harris

Disbarred on March 16, 2005 (182 N.J. 594) for being a “persistent violator” and committing ethical violations in 11 separate matters, including lack of diligence, dishonest conduct, conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, knowingly disobeying the rules of a tribunal, using a misleading professional designation, failing to comply with R.1:20-20 as a suspended attorney, failing to safekeep property and instituting frivolous litigation. Walton W. Kingsbery III appeared before the Supreme Court for the OAE and Angelo J. Falciani represented the respondent. The respondent was previously disciplined: Temporary suspension in 1999; temporary suspension and admonition in 2000; suspension for six months and suspension for three months in 2001.

Monday, March 14, 2005

Gary E. Botchman

Disbarred by consent (182 N.J. 593) for pleading guilty in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York to a one-count Information charging conspiracy to commit bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 371.

Tuesday, March 8, 2005

Marvin S. Davidson

Reprimanded on March 8, 2005 (182 N.J. 587) for negligently misappropriating client trust funds totaling more than $28,000 and failing to reconcile his attorney trust account, as required by R.1:21-6. Michael J. Sweeney appeared before the DRB for the OAE and respondent appeared pro se. This case was discovered solely by the Random Audit Program.

Marvin Lehman

Reprimanded on March 8, 2005 (182 N.J. 589) for negligently misappropriating client trust funds, failing to maintain records required by R.1:21-6 and commingling personal and client funds in his trust account and paying business and personal expenses from that same account. John McGill III appeared before the DRB for the OAE and Raymond S. Londa represented the respondent. This case was discovered solely by the Trust Overdraft Notification Program.

C. Aaron Patel

Reprimanded on March 8, 2005 (182 N.J. 587) for negligently misappropriating client trust funds and failing to maintain proper trust and business accounting records under R.1:21-6. Michael J. Sweeney appeared before the DRB for the OAE and respondent waived appearance. This case was discovered solely by the Trust Overdraft Notification Program.

Jeffrey W. Truitt

Suspended for one year on March 8, 2005 (183 N.J. 1) for failing to safeguard clients’ funds, preparing a false RESPA statement, submitting false information to the OAE during its audit, negligently invading client funds, commingling personal and client funds and failing to maintain proper attorney trust account records. John J. Janasie appeared before the DRB for the OAE and respondent failed to appear.

Thursday, February 24, 2005

Steven A. Pasternak

Disbarred on February 24, 2005 (182 N.J. 531) for knowingly misappropriating trust funds in two client matters. John McGill III appeared before the DRB for the OAE and Rachel A. Akohonae represented respondent. The respondent was previously disciplined: Temporarily suspended in 2001.

Michael A. Zindler

Admonished on February 24, 2005 (Unreported) for improperly procuring releases from his clients for malpractice claims that they may have had against him, without complying with the provisions of RPC 1.8(h)(2). George Singley appeared before the DRB for District IIIB and Kevin H. Michels represented the respondent.

Edward T. Basaman

Reprimanded on February 24, 2005 (182 N.J. 460) for failing to act diligently in connection with two client matters and failing to cooperate with the district ethics committee. Suzanne M. Jorgensen appeared before the DRB for District IIIA and respondent failed to appear. The respondent was previously disciplined: Suspended for
three months in 2003.

Wednesday, February 23, 2005

Anthony J. Simmons

Admonished on February 23, 2005 (Unreported) for failing to return $7,000 out of a $7,500 retainer paid by clients to represent them in a criminal matter. The $7,000 refund was ordered by a district fee arbitration committee. In a second matter, the respondent unilaterally withdrew from representing clients in connection with state and federal criminal charges in order that respondent could seek medical treatment in Minnesota. Although he notified the judges in both proceedings, he failed to notify his clients that he was withdrawing from their representation. The DRB also ordered that, prior to resuming practice in this state, respondent provide proof of fitness to practice law as attested by a psychiatrist approved by the OAE. Elizabeth A. Kenny appeared before the DRB for District VA and respondent appeared pro se.

Tuesday, February 22, 2005

Patrick Dimartini

Admonished on February 22, 2005 (Unreported) for failing to insure that an $8,500 check given to him by his clients as down payment on real estate was promptly deposited in his trust account soon after its delivery. The check was then taken from respondent’s office and illegally cashed by a third person. Respondent’s actions constituted a failure to safeguard clients’ funds. Margaret M. Marley appeared before the DRB for District VI and Jorge L. Aviles represented the respondent. The respondent was previously disciplined: Suspended for three months in 1999.

Ronald W. Spevack

Admonished on February 22, 2005 (Unreported) for exhibiting a lack of diligence and failing to pursue a client’s appeal of a decision by the Social Security Administration. Craig M. Terkowitz appeared before the DRB for District VIII and respondent appeared pro se.

Frank Fusco

Admonished on February 22, 2005 (Unreported) for engaging in a conflict of interest by representing both the buyer and seller in a real estate transaction without obtaining their consent. The respondent also threatened to file a civil suit against one of the clients who threatened to report him to disciplinary authorities. Jeffrey L. Clutterbuck appeared before the DRB for District IIA and respondent appeared pro se.

Fayth A. Ruffin

Admonished on February 22, 2005 (Unreported) for failing to file an answer for her client to a counterclaim in connection with litigation, thereby causing a default judgment in the amount of $12,000 to be entered against her client. James A. Mella appeared before the DRB for District VB and Charles E. Austin represented the respondent.

Anthony R. Atwell

Admonished on February 22, 2005 (Unreported) for failing to communicate with an estate client by repeatedly canceling scheduled appointments because the respondent had lost the estate file. He also delayed for 2 ½ years reconstructing the file, thus engaging in a lack of diligent conduct. Thomas P. Scrivo appeared before the DRB for District VB and Peter Ventrice represented the respondent.

Friday, February 18, 2005

Alan Zark

Admonished on February 18, 2005 (Unreported) for failing to communicate with his clients and failing to reply to requests for information from them. Nitza I. Blasini appeared before the DRB for the OAE and respondent appeared pro se.

Thursday, February 17, 2005

Daniel S. Chilewich, Esquire *** SUSPENDED ***

New Jersey, February 17, 2005. Hear Ye! Hear Ye!

On this date, in the Garden State, the Supreme Court of New Jersey suspended Daniel S. Chilewich (Respondent) as a result of Respondent’s guilty plea in the Supreme Court of New York, County of New York, to the first degree offense of offering a false instrument for filing, a class E felony, in violation of §175.35 of the Penal Law of the State of New York. The basis for the plea was that the Respondent caused a retainer statement to be filed with the New York Office of Court Administration which he knew to be false. The falsity arose out of Respondent’s payment of a runner for referral fees in personal injury actions.

Richard J. Engelhardt appeared before the Discipline Review Board for the Office of Attorney Ethics. Kim D. Ringler appeared for the Respondent.

Mr. Chilewich is a repeat offender of the Rules of 'Professional' Conduct. He was temporarily suspended in 2005.

Mr. Chilewich's aggregate unethical conduct has not yet risen to the level deemed meritorious of disbarment by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Mr. Chilewich's license to practice law was suspended on February 17, 2005 for a period of 12 months.

Were any of Mr. Chilewich's clients injured as a consequence of his actions? If so, are those who were injured satisfied with the discipline imposed in this case? Has restitution been made?

Have there been any other instances of misconduct by Mr. Chilewich that haven't been addressed by Office of Attorney Ethics?

Thursday, February 10, 2005

Richard J. Zeitler

Disbarred on February 10, 2005 (182 N.J. 389) for a 30-year egregious disciplinary history, culminating in unethical conduct in three client matters, including the virtual abandonment of the clients and his misrepresentations to them and to courts, in one case using his wife’s multiple schlerosis as an excuse for his laxness, when he falsely advised a trial court that he could not appear because he had to take her to a New York hospital for treatment. The Court stated that: “Despite having received numerous opportunities to reform himself, respondent has continued to display his disregard, indeed contempt, for our disciplinary rules and our ethics system.” Respondent was previously disciplined: Suspended for one year in 1976; suspended for two years in 1980; admonished in 1995; reprimanded in 1999; reprimanded twice in 2000. Brian D. Gillet appeared before the Supreme Court for the OAE and Douglas R. Kleinfeld appeared for respondent.

Tuesday, February 8, 2005

James D. Nichols

Reprimanded on February 8, 2005 (182 N.J. 433) for grossly neglecting two immigration matters, failing to communicate with a client and failing to return an unearned fee. Richard A. Deutchman appeared before the DRB for District VIII and respondent appeared pro se. The respondent was previously reprimanded in 1984.

Friday, February 4, 2005

Gladys J.M. Garbin

Reprimanded on February 4, 2005 (182 N.J. 432) for grossly neglecting a motion to enforce litigant’s rights in a divorce action, resulting in harm to the client, failing to communicate and failing to promptly return the file to the client. Maria J. LaSala appeared before the DRB for District XI and respondent appeared pro se. The respondent was previously disciplined by admonition in 2004.

Wednesday, January 26, 2005

Rafael A. Prado

Transferred to disability inactive status on a certified record on January 26, 2005 (182 N.J. 313) due to evidence that he lacks the capacity to practice law and is incapable of assisting counsel or representing himself. Lawrence E. Sindoni represented District VI before the DRB, which recommended a three-month suspension. Nitza I. Blasini appeared for the OAE before the Supreme Court.

Robert J. Handfuss

Suspended for one year on a certified record on January 26, 2005 (182 N.J. 309) for failing to return escrow funds to the sellers of real estate after they paid the bill and submitted proof to him. Respondent also failed to cooperate with the disciplinary system during the investigation and processing of the matter. Regina D. Aifer represented District IX before the DRB and respondent failed to appear.

Larry J. McClure

Suspended for one year on a certified record on January 26, 2005 (182 N.J. 312) for failing to comply with R.1:20-20 requiring, among other things, notice to clients, courts and adversaries of his prior suspension from practice and for failing to cooperate with disciplinary authorities. Respondent was previously disciplined: Admonition in 1999; Six-Month Suspension in 2003; and Six-Month Suspension in 2004. Michael J. Sweeney represented the OAE before the DRB and respondent failed to appear.

Kathleen F. Gahles

Admonished on January 26, 2005 (Unreported) for failing to treat with courtesy and consideration all persons involved in the legal process when, during oral argument in a matrimonial motion, she made degrading statements about an opposing party – her client’s wife – with no substantial purpose other than to embarrass the wife. The respondent was previously reprimanded in 1999. Lawrence M. Maron appeared before the DRB for District XI and respondent appeared pro se.

Friday, January 21, 2005

John F. Coffey, II

Admonished on January 21, 2005 (Unreported) for lack of diligence and failure to communicate with a client in a bankruptcy matter. Lawrence E. Sindoni appeared before the DRB for District VI. Respondent appeared pro se.

Wednesday, January 19, 2005

Nkem E. Odinkemere, A/K/A E. Nkem Odinkemere

Disbarred on January 19, 2005 (182 N.J. 274) for knowingly misappropriating client trust funds, issuing trust checks to himself to which he was not entitled, abdicating his office to his staff, who handled matters independently, assisting in the unauthorized practice of law and engaging in improper fee sharing with non-attorneys. Janice L. Richter appeared before the Supreme Court for the OAE and Saul J. Steinberg appeared for the respondent. This case was discovered solely by the Trust Overdraft Notification Program. The respondent was temporarily suspended on September 14, 2000 for non-cooperation.

Saturday, January 15, 2005

Patricia Adelle, Esquirette *** SUSPENDED ***

New Jersey, January 15, 2005. Hear Ye! Hear Ye!

On this date, in the Garden State, the Supreme Court of New Jersey suspended Patricia Adelle (Respondent) for misconduct in five client matters, including negligent misappropriation of trust funds, lack of diligence, failure to communicate with clients, failure to turn over a file, recordkeeping violations and failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities during the investigation and processing of this matter.

Janice L. Richter appeared before the Discipline Review Board for the Office of Attorney Ethics. Respondent waived appearance.

Ms. Adelle is a repeat offender of the Rules of 'Professional' Conduct. She was reprimanded in 2002; suspended for three months in 2002 and suspended for three months in 2004.

Ms. Adelle's aggregate unethical conduct has not yet risen to the level deemed meritorious of disbarment by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Ms. Adelle's license to practice law was suspended on January 15, 2005 for a period of 6 months.

Were any of Ms. Adelle's clients injured as a consequence of her actions? If so, are those who were injured as a consequence of her misconduct satisfied with the discipline imposed in this case? Has restitution been made? Have there been any other instances of misconduct by Ms. Adelle?

Monday, Janu